Assignment #11

Question: What does the composer assume the audience knows or believes?

I think that Stein assumes that the audience knows the basics of computers, the Super Bowl and advertisements. I do not know if this article could exist without this basic knowledge of these subjects. Stein starts out the article with this quote: "...it was a defining moment, not only of the heralded computer revolution but also of what has become out media landscape..." (Stein 279). I think that is is a writerly choice of sorts because an author must assume that the audience has some basic knowledge of everyday items.

Question: When is an audience likely to encounter the text? How might this shape their responses?

The audience is mostly likely to encounter this article in an academic setting. I think especially on research into computers and/or advertising. There really is no specific example that fits in my opinion. I think this hurts Stein though because most of my classmates were confused on the wording and how it is very dry.

Question: How does the composer end? How will the end affect how the audience looks back on the rest of the composition?

Stein ends like an academic would, with a conclusion. I think she attempts to sum up her argument, but I think she leaves the audience more confused than satisfied. For example: "This analysis has suggested that in understanding the rhetorical constitution of the audience through ideological codes used to construct the narrative we can begin to fathom how commodity techno-discourses work in our lives" (Stein 299). I am confused typing it out!!

I think that Stein is an amazing writer, but her attention to such detail leaves the audience so confused that it makes no sense. It has been over a month with this article and I do not think that I still fully understand it! I keep trying, but it does not seem that it will happen anytime soon. I think this is why I have chosen to keep this essay out of my portfolio.

[Group work] Reflection

We were working together because that was the assignment. However when it came to the drawing, we split the work to make it easier on us. We work really well together, there were no issues. His ideas were very solid and based in the texts. He helped me work out a few things I did not understand.

I was shocked to find Regan next to the Terminator on the 5th one-pager. I understand why, but still seems a bit odd. I think their question was: how did this effect the current government? or something to that effect. I think that the answer to this question is that I could only imagine how the people thought of the government after these movies that the ads are loosely based on. It was a terrifying time to most Americans.

I liked how the 6th one-pager showed different parts of the ad. I'm pretty sure their question was "What was Stein's view?" I think her view was that this ad changed the outlook of the computer race, but also changed the way Americans look at many other things like politics.

I think this still leaves me confused on why Stein wrote such great detail in an article on an ad from 1984. Does it really matter what this ad really meant? That's kind of like saying me analyzing the "What's up" Budweiser commercials from the late 1990's.

My CP: How does Stein use the history of Apple to support her thoughts on the impact of the ad.

Assignment #10

My two questions are: Why does Stein use so many movies to explain the Apple ad? Why does Stein go into specific detail?

Stein takes a 1984 Apple ad and goes into great detail explaining every bit of it, including the history of Apple and the effects that the ad had on pop culture after it aired. Stein breaks down the ad and uses popular movies and books to interpret the images in the ad. She also uses the work of various famous philosophers to interpret the meaning behind certain parts of the ad.

I think Stein wanted to research this ad to prove that even 60 seconds can change the world. By doing this, I think she was trying to convince the readers that this ad could be responsible for the modern world in a weird way. For example: "[the "1984" Apple ad] turned the Super Bowl into an advertising event for new campaigns..." (Stein 290)

Assignment #9

I see myself engaging the most with just the general public, but maybe more specifically people who are on the border of accepting Taxidermy as an everyday life activity and not a taboo culture. "They are normal humans, nothing like what the media make them out to be. In class we talked about a spot where Orlean takes a taxidermists statement and makes the person sound weird" (Modlinski 2). I try to use Orlean's writing to persuade my readers to believe that taxidermy is not as taboo as most people think it is. "They are normal humans, nothing like what the media make them out to be. In class we talked about a spot where Orlean takes a taxidermists statement and makes the person sound weird" (2). I think my experiences with taxidermy helps me try to get my point across. For example: "I immediately was connected to this because of my childhood experiences. In my opinion, she captured those moments perfectly" (1). I think ethical dimension of communication to me means that you try to broaden your reader's experience with your writing. For example, I try to use my experiences around taxidermy to change the reader's opinion on the subject. I will try to add more of these thoughts into my next revision of this paper. 

Assignment #8

I found it interesting that the class was fairly new to taxidermy. The authors I read knew about it, but did not experience it like I have. I thought their thoughts on the article provide me with a different insight. This is a major departure from my take on this article. I take the point of someone who grew up around taxidermy. I think the writing styles are pretty similar though. I hope to continue a different point of view as well as my view.

My audience for Sedaris was one that I thought had probably been in an airport at least once. So naturally I figured that it is easy to relate my feelings to the audience. However, with "Lifelike" I took the stance that most of my audience probably has had no experience with taxidermy and probably takes it as a taboo subject. My tone is informative. I try to relate my experiences to the audience as best as I can.

Assignment #7

Why does Orlean choose to use the seminars in the article? Is it a good idea?

Why does Orlean include the history of taxidermy? Was it a good idea?

The thought that Orlean choose to include the seminars in the article is an interesting thought. The seminars are about how to perform certain procedures on the taxidermy-ed animals. They did not directly involve anything to do with the competition itself. I think Orlean was trying to add to the fact that there was more to do at the competition than just the competition. You can learn more about your profession, if you're a taxidermist, but if you are not a taxidermist, you can still learn how they conduct their profession. It makes the championship sound more like an attract to the general public more than just a boring and taboo competition.

The thought that Orlean includes the history of taxidermy in the article is also an interesting thought. The average reader of The New Yorker would probably not know much about the world of taxidermy besides the common thought of taboo. In general, an author should include some history of the subject that they are covering. It is a good practice if you want to be a good writer. However, I do find it extremely interesting that Orlean includes everything including the websites. I think she realizes that if the reader decides that they want more correct information about taxidermy, they could easily access it through the websites.

Assignment 6: Choices

One major thing to me is the fact that Orlean included the history of the websites she mentions throughout the article. "...and three thousand visits to Taxidermy.net every day, where taxidermists can trade information and goods with as little self-consciousness as you find on a knitting Web site:" (Orlean 3) This is interesting because the fact that there is taxidermy websites does not matter to the championships and should not effect the reader's thought on the championships. The fact that she continues to use it throughout the article is interesting too. I wonder why she thought that the reader would care about a website, especially in 2003!! I, myself, looked up the site, but I was curious because I grew up around taxidermy. I think the time period she wrote this in probably lead her to believe the reader might look it up because the Internet was still fairly new to the majority of the world.

I had mentioned this in class, but the fact that she turns to the feelings of the taxidermists themselves is interesting. "The taxidermists take the competition very seriously." (Orlean 4)I think it is very important that Orlean includes this thought. One can assume that the taxidermists take the competition seriously, but it reinforces the idea into the reader's mind. I realized during class that the majority of the general public, does not like the idea of taxidermy as trophies, none the less as museum pieces. If this was say American Idol, would everyone thoughts be the same? I think the majority of the general public would say that they like it. However, if you talked to any musician, they will tell you it is the dumbest thing on earth. Do the contestants of American Idol take the competition seriously? I would hope so, or why are you on the show in the first place? So my thought is: if you do not like the subject, does it make it wrong or stupid? To you, it might. But to the taxidermists would think otherwise. I think Orlean realized this and the fact that she added it to the article, is very important! This definitely adds to the dedication that is shown with the mention of the websites and the next choice, the seminars.

I find it also very interesting that Orlean adds the information about the seminars. I think that this is more important to the article than the thoughts on the various websites on taxidermy. "In the seminars, the atmosphere was as sober and exacting as a tax-law colloquium. 'Wiskers,' one of the instructors said to the group, giving them a stern look. 'I pull them out. I label them..." (5) I think that Orlean adding the thoughts about the seminars adds almost a attraction feel to the championships. I feel that maybe the next time that they are held, that more people will show up not only because of the mounts that are entered into the competition, but as to maybe hear the seminars and attend the various other activities. Orlean paints a picture that provides an event that anyone could attend if they feel like they might have an interest in the championships.

Work Cited:
Orlean, Susan. "Lifelike." The New Yorker 9 June, 2003. Online.

Assignment 6

I think Orlean's tone is informative, but surprised. She is especially surprised in the beginning of the article. For example: "The championships were held in April at the Springfield, Illinois, Crowne Plaza hotel, the sort of nicely appointed place that seems more suited to regional sales conferences and rehearsal dinners than to having wolves in the corridors and people crossing the lobby shouting, 'Heads up! Buffalo coming through!" (Orlean 1) Here Orlean reveals a sense of astonishment to the fact that this fancy hotel is holding a taboo event. I think she is a reliable author , because she seems to be surprised and informative. She maintains here ethos throughout the piece in my opinion, due to the fact that she talks to various people throughout the event. Orlean conveys the facts involved throughout this piece. She considers the fact that the reader may know absolutely nothing about taxidermy and the fact that the reader may be a taxidermist. She keeps the flow of facts about the championship and taxidermy in general consistent and informative throughout the piece. I believe Orlean wrote an article instead of another medium, because she was assigned this piece and there was no other choice for her.

Work Cited:
Orlean, Susan. "Lifelike." The New Yorker 9 June, 2003. Online.

Assignment #5

I grew up in a hunting family. In fact, I have written an article on searching for shed elk antlers and in fact won the Youth Volunteer of the Year Award-Eastern States for the Rocky Mountain Elk Foundation. So in my experience, these types of articles are usually assigned to the journalist or the journalist has an expressed interest in the subject. In this case, Orlean seems to have been assigned this piece. Her purpose was probably because it was assigned to her. However, her topic informs the reader of the happenings of the World Taxidermy Championships. She explains in specific details the events she witness. She made it feel like you were in the same room sitting right next to her.

I think that she was trying to bring a taboo subject to a wider audience. In my experience, most people cringe at the thought of a stuffed animal or hunting in general. This article conveys the fact that not all mounts are acquired from hunting, but also natural causes. She almost sympathizes with the taxidermists that their art is a very important thing that people either ignore or hate. She reveals that the art is not only in skinning the animal, but also in the very specific details that come with the profession. 

As a person who grew up around taxidermy, nothing seemed to stand out to me. I have handled some mounts before and have seen some amazing mounts of bears and elk. One specific one is of a 8 ft Alaskan Brown Bear whom is standing on its hind legs with its paws ready to attack. I used to watch a TV show on the History Channel entitled "Mounted in Alaska." It showed the viewer what it was like to taxidermy an animal. Orlean left out a lot of the gore involved, but left in the majority of the harder tasks. I think that Orlean probably realized that hunters and taxidermists would probably read this article. I think she conveyed the details beautifully. 

My questions as follows:

  If you are a person that looks at taxidermy as hatred towards animals, did this piece change your mind? If so how? Does Orlean take the taboo associated with the profession out of it? Did you realize that what she was getting at is that they respect and love animals and that is why they follow this profession?

Here is a great photo of a Wisconsin elk!!

                                         Here is my article that ran in a national newsletter!!

Standing By CP

My controlling purpose is the comic relief of Sedaris as well as the judgments the characters have on each other.

Reflecting on Revision

I thought most about the others' writing that they had conveyed a specific theme. In one case, it was racisim. Nothing really specific stood out to me, but it was interesting to see that they chose racisim. It was not surprising to me that they chose it, but it was intriguing to think that they would chose that specific route. I was intrigued because I really had not used the idea of racisim in my paper only stupdity and comic relief.  This specific student used racism to convey the specific part about the hatred which the student saw in the instance of the two men conveyed for President Obama.

I really did not that about what I was writing. I looked at the requirements and wrote what I thought sounded good. I have really no reason behind picking specific things besides that they were in the piece and because of this, I felt that they needed to be touched in my paper. I would clean any misleading statemtents up in my paper to reflect the main point of it. For example: "When most people hear the name: Adolf Hitler, they usually feel a hatred for the name. However, just because that one man at one point in history committed some horrible crimes, does not mean that all people named Adolf or Hitler will or have committed the same crimes or any crime at all. Parents are still naming their children Josef and that Stalin, another dictator’s, first name."
 

Assignment #4: Choices

    In the case of the world around him, he probably wrote it because he really was just fed up with the things he encountered throughout his travels. He probably wanted to convey his frustrations with the general public. I think that the effects on his readers are that it hopefully makes them realize that they may have acted without using common sense before they committed actions. I think that this is the main purpose of the the piece and it relates to everything in the piece.

    The time that Sedaris chose, may not have any purpose behind it. It might have been that these encounters just happen to be after certain historical events. It may have been that he only wanted to touch on these specific encounters due to the fact that they take place after historical events. The effects of this choice may be to have the sympathize the reader with him in the same opinions that Sedaris has himself. This choice relates to everything because it relates to the main purpose of showing how people can act without using common sense. 

     Sedaris chose to show the disrespect for others to show that there is still certain feelings in this world. It too was the main purpose of the piece. I believe he wanted to show the disrespect that still happens in the world today. It might actually shock the reader into realizing that they have either, been a victim, perpetrator or a witness to the disrespect. It connects to everything that is in the piece. In fact it is a bases to the piece.

    I think that Sedaris chose to use a magazine article is to reach the biggest audience. He probably was doing it for more money and more awareness of his topic. It may not have reached the right readers or in fact it may have reached everyone that should have read the piece at that point in time. This is a major factor to the piece, because it brings all the components to the readers as the author intended to.

Assignment #4

Well in my opinion I think that Sedaris wrote this piece because he was fed up with the stupidity which he witnesses the majority of his travels. The time he is living in is a post 9/11 and post President Barack Obama being elected for the first time world. 9/11 caused countless changes to the air travel industry. The election of President Obama has sparked a new way of thinking in the United States. That race still means that you can do anything, however it has also brought up a lot of racism that was not that present. It does make a lot of people angry with the current way of  government. He sees a lot of the disrespect for others. In the instance of the young man wearing the t-shirt, he realizes that he could be the next President of the United States. He tries to convey the age-old saying: "Don't judge a book by its cover!" I do find it interesting that Sedaris uses a magazine article though. He could have submitted it to a psychology or sociological journal as a new opinion on human behavior in an airport.

Assignment #3

        My thoughts on "Standing By' by David Sedaris is that it is a very interesting piece that makes one really think about it. Right away the reader sympathizes with the narrator, because they probably have gone through some of the things he has. It also makes one wonder why he is writing an article on problems with flight. Was he commissioned to write this? Did he shop the article around? Who was his intended audience? One could argue that he probably was not commissioned to write this, because no self-respecting magazine would commission an article on flight delays. So he must have written it for his own column or with intent to shop it around. His direction with this piece seems to state that he was a satirical piece on the air traveling. This first story takes place in 2003, not to long after the September 11^th tragedy that changed not only The United States, but also air travel. 

         After a few moments of hearing the men behind him complaining about the nation, Sedaris tunes them out as well. He daydreams to a previous adventure while trying to catch a flight. “I was on the people mover…when the voice over the P.A. system asked Adolf Hitler to pick up a white courtesy phone.” (277) He uses this as humor, but it is also a very good lesson in social respect. When most people hear the name: Adolf Hitler, they usually feel a hatred for the name. However, just because that one man at one point in history committed some horrible crimes, does not mean that all people named Adolf or Hitler will or have committed the same crimes or any crime at all. Parents are still naming their children Josef and that is Stalin's, another dictator, first name. What Sedaris is saying is that one cannot judge a book by its cover. That the person you are criticizing might be exactly just like you, but forgot to do laundry the day before his vacation and was forced to wear a certain T-Shirt.

          I thing that Sedaris uses the ideas and thoughts in "Standing By" to make his readers realize that they probably have acted some of the ways that his characters do or have been the victims of these actions. It makes the reader open their eyes to their actions and the actions of other around them. It is amazing when one realizes that they are either the perpetrator or the victim of these actions.

         My questions are: Have any of you ever experience anything like these scenarios? Have you been the perpetrator? the victim?

Introduction

A. Your name and where you're from

Hi, my name is Rory Modlinski and I am from Franklin, WI.

B. Tell us about your family or pets.

I live in the dorms, but at home I live with my sister, parents, and grandmother. No pets, I have allergies.

C.What do you like to do in your free time?

I am a musician, so most of my time is dedicated to playing more music.

D. If you had one wish, what would you wish for?
My one wish would be for: world peace. Yes, it is very corny, but seriously people would be less cranky.

E. What is your favorite thing about Milwaukee or Wisconsin?
My favorite thing about Milwaukee is naturally the music scene. The world's largest music festival, Summerfest, and the world's largest Irish festival? Who wouldn't enjoy that??

F. Describe you field of study and professional goals. What led you to choose your major/goals?
I am studying music history and anthropology. I would like to get into studying the Irish influence into American folk music, specifically in Appalachia. I grew p in the Irish folk music tradition, so it is a natural choice.

G. What is the best class you've ever taken? Why?
Pretty much any music class I would say is an amazing class. However, my most favorite is a songwriting course I took. I liked it so much because I could write songs and get credit for it!

H. Describe your background as a writer and reader. What kinds of writing did you do during high school, for work, or for yourself?
I actually didn't go to high school and I have never had a job that required writing. I do however write songs and I really enjoy that. I also would like to write a novel or two.

I. What kinds of reading do you enjoy most?
I really enjoy reading mysteries and adventure novels, but I also enjoy non-fiction. Also, I have been working on the 5th Harry Potter since 2004. I keep forgetting I am reading it.

J. Compose a simile that reflects your personal view of writing: "For me, writing is like..."
For me writing is telling your feelings. I even include homework assignments, because they are still my ideas to a degree.

K. What are your biggest fears or concerns about college-level writing?
My biggest fear is analytic writing. I can never seem to understand analyzing a piece of writing. Hopefully I can get over that.

L. Describe the goals you have for this class or how you'd like to improve your writing skills.
I think my last answer answered this question too.

M. What kind of learning environment do you need?
A classroom. Quite honestly I can learn anywhere at anytime.

N. What else should your classmates know about you?
I am fun to be around with. Here's a picture from Milwaukee Irish Fest 2012. I am playing with Edna Scahill (Left) and Gerry O'Connor (Right), two of the top 10 tenor banjo players out of Ireland right now.

"Standing By"

"Standing By," written by David Sedaris tells of a frustrated airplane passenger's experiences while waiting for planes. He starts out by explaining his delay in an airport and the frustrations it can cause a passenger. He then moves on to giving a little insight into the "codes" used by flight attendants while helping passengers. This leads him to his experience in the Denver airport in a line waiting to get a new flight. He meets a grandmother whom is criticizing a group of young teenagers. There were two boys and a girl. The girl was holding a baby and the two boys looked like brothers. The grandmother believed that the baby belonged to the girl and the one brother who was wearing an explicit T-shirt. Sedaris eventually ignored her as he found that he didn't agree with her politically. Have a few moments, two guys behind him started complaining about the hassles they were going through and then eventually politics. The discussion on politics lead Sedaris to ignore them. He started daydreaming about the time he was jogging through an airport and thought he heard Adolf Hitler's name called over the P.A. system. This lead him to realize that airports possibly bring the worst out of people.

Sedaris, David. "Standing By." First Year Comp. Reader. Boston. Pearson, 2011. 275-277. Print

Assignment #2

I have already taken this course, so nothing really comes as a shock to me. However, I am looking forward to improving my skills as a writer. I do consider that this course, English 101, will help me become a better writer  not just in the English department, but also as a reseacher and songwriter in the music department.