I see myself engaging the most with just the general public, but maybe more specifically people who are on the border of accepting Taxidermy as an everyday life activity and not a taboo culture. "They
are normal humans, nothing like what the media make them out to be. In class we
talked about a spot where Orlean takes a taxidermists statement and makes the
person sound weird" (Modlinski 2). I try to use Orlean's writing to persuade my readers to believe that taxidermy is not as taboo as most people think it is. "They
are normal humans, nothing like what the media make them out to be. In class we
talked about a spot where Orlean takes a taxidermists statement and makes the
person sound weird" (2). I think my experiences with taxidermy helps me try to get my point across. For example: "I immediately
was connected to this because of my childhood experiences. In my opinion, she
captured those moments perfectly" (1). I think ethical dimension of communication to me means that you try to broaden your reader's experience with your writing. For example, I try to use my experiences around taxidermy to change the reader's opinion on the subject. I will try to add more of these thoughts into my next revision of this paper.
No comments:
Post a Comment